
Real Money Gaming Ban in India

India shut down a $3.2 billion industry in 72 hours without any warning signal. The government called it consumer protection. The data, eight months later, calls it something else. By now, most of us are well aware of the movement to ban Real Money Gaming (RMG) in India. While the headlines focus on the ban itself, there is a deeper crisis hiding in plain sight which we call “The Displacement Effect.”
India passed the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Act (PROGA) in August 2025. Presidential assent came within three days. The industry which once valued at roughly $2.5 billion a year, employing millions and drawing an estimated $3 billion in foreign investment, now faces an existential crisis. This is not just a policy story. It is an economic and consumer safety emergency playing out in real time.
Source : Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill, 2025 – PIB Official PDF
Government Enacts Online Gaming Act 2025 – Press Information Bureau (PIB)
Understanding the RMG Landscape
RMG is a simple concept to understand. These are games where you stake real cash like online rummy, fantasy cricket on Dream11, card games on A23 and win or lose based on your skill and the game’s outcome. Mostly these games run on cloud gaming infrastructure where there is no heavy download needed. Just open an app, deposit money via UPI and then play. RMG platforms use RNG, Random Number Generators which are essentially fair dice rolls coded into software to prevent cheating or rigging. India’s online gamer base expanded to 488 million in 2024, with more than 155 million engaging specifically with RMG sub-segments like fantasy sports, rummy, poker, and other transaction-based games. As per industry estimates, 86% of sector revenues came from RMG formats led by companies like Dream11, Games24x7, WinZO, MPL, Zupee, Gameskraft, and My11Circle.
Behind every platform there is a team which includes a Game Economy Designer. Think of this person as the CFO of the game world. The professional who balances in-game cash flows so players win fairly without breaking the bank for the operator. They calibrate entry fees, prize pools, rake percentages, and payout ratios. It is a compliance-heavy role that sits at the intersection of math, regulation, and user psychology. And this role should be prevalent in any game which involves real money in the platform.
The Stated Objective vs. The Economic Reality
The government’s stated goal was consumer protection. IT Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw declared that the bill gives “priority to the welfare of society” and targets “a big evil that is creeping into society.” No one disputes that addiction and debt are real problems. But the economic cost of this remedy is staggering.
Before The Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Act (PROGA), RMG contributed approximately Rs 20,000 crore per year in the form of direct and indirect taxes. The industry created more than 200,000 jobs, supported over 400 startups, and generated around $2.3 billion in taxes. The government essentially shut down a compliance-heavy, taxpaying, court-validated industry overnight with no transition window, no scrutiny of existing licenses, and no consultation with stakeholders.
Source : Full Year Results 2025 – iGaming Business
Q2 FY26 Earnings Report – PTI News
What is the Displacement Effect ?
Have you ever wondered where 155 million users went when the apps disappeared ?
Here is what the government got badly wrong. Banning a product does not kill demand. It just redirects it. A December 2025 survey by CUTS International tracked 1,000 former RMG users in Delhi-NCR after PROGA took effect. The India gaming FDI loss was already making headlines. What wasn’t making headlines was that offshore betting platform usage jumped from 68.3% to 82% after the ban. A 20% relative increase in users moving to completely unregulated foreign sites. These offshore platforms like Bet365, Betway, 1xBet, Paddy Power operate with zero Indian regulatory oversight. They have no KYC checks aligned with Indian law. No grievance redressal is possible in case needed. The money flows out of India entirely. Users continue to fund accounts using Indian payment infrastructure like UPI, allowing money to flow to overseas operators outside India’s regulatory perimeter.
The government has blocked over 7,800 betting websites post-ban. Enforcement officials call it a hydra problem where if you block one domain, three mirrors appear within hours. Meanwhile, the RMG displacement effect continues. Monthly spend by users on offshore platforms has surged with users spending Rs 5,000 to Rs 9,999 per month on foreign sites which grew from 7.6% to 26.2%.
Source : Behavioural Reallocation after the Online Gaming Ban – Dailyhunt/News Patrolling
India’s Gaming Market Hit $1.5B Post-RMG – Outlook Respawn
Let’s understand this from History with The Telangana Case
This is not new. India has done this experiment at the state level before. Telangana passed its Gaming (Amendment) Act in 2017, one of the toughest state-level bans on RMG. Despite the explicit ban on online Real Money Gaming platforms in Telangana and neighboring Andhra Pradesh, many operators continued to flout the law, exploiting legal and technological loopholes. A PRAHAR study found that 96% of users in Telangana still engaged in online betting despite knowing it was illegal.
The players did not stop. They just moved to unregulated, offshore apps with no safety net, no addiction controls, no recourse when they lost money. There was a disturbing rise in cases where individuals accessed banned betting applications through internet backdoors resulting in severe financial losses and, tragically, a number of suicides. The ban worsened the problem even more.
The central government looked at that Telangana outcome and repeated the exact same policy at a national scale.
Source : Telangana Gaming Amendment Impact – Storyboard18
Financial Consequences
The financial damage from PROGA is already historic. Over 90 days, RMG platforms recorded asset write-downs of more than $840 million, and about 7,000 Indian workers lost their jobs. US-based Flutter Entertainment posted a $556 million impairment following the shutdown of Junglee Games. Canadian private equity firm Clairvest Group wrote off its investment in Head Digital Works, operator of A23 Rummy. Nazara Technologies recorded an impairment of $103.2 million on its investment in Moonshine Technologies, parent of PokerBaazi.
For investors, these are not paper losses but NPV write-offs on businesses that were generating real cash flows, paying GST, and filing returns. Overall gaming revenues declined in 2025 due to regulatory intervention, with the money gaming segment recording a 17% decline and a 26% drop in revenues before its full shutdown. FDI in this sector had drawn an estimated $3 billion before the ban. That pipeline is now frozen. Media attorney Probir Roy Chowdhury put it plainly stating this sharp policy reversal “signals to investors that the government can arbitrarily dismantle a thriving sector, creating significant regulatory risk.”
Source : India’s Apex Court Deferral – SiGMA World
Danger to the Consumer
The biggest losers here are not the startups or the investors. The 155 million users who were playing on regulated, taxed, audited platforms that had RNG certification, responsible gaming features, and dispute resolution systems. Lumikai’s State of India Interactive Media Report 2025 found that roughly one in three former RMG users migrated to offshore betting platforms post-ban. On those platforms none of them are Indian, none of them are regulated. There are no mandatory spend limits. There are no certified RNG audits. No self-exclusion tools. No cooling-off requirements. No consumer authority to complain to when a platform freezes withdrawals. The 155 million users who were gambling on audited, GST-paying, court-validated Indian platforms are now gambling in the dark with operators in Curaçao and Gibraltar.
Is there any way ahead ?
Every other major market with a gambling problem found a way to regulate rather than ban.The UK Gambling Commission licenses operators, mandates responsible gaming tools, caps deposits, and collects substantial tax revenue. Australia allows licensed online sports betting with consumer protections built into every operator agreement. Sweden runs a national licensing system with addiction treatment funded directly by operator levies. None of these countries eliminated problem gambling. But all of them kept tax revenue onshore and consumers inside a legal, accountable framework.
India had its own version drafted. The amended IT Rules of 2021 laid out a tiered co-regulatory framework with self-regulatory bodies, KYC norms, and dispute resolution mechanisms designed specifically for RMG. A risk-based, compliance-heavy licensing model structured like SEBI’s broker regulation could have addressed addiction and fraud without destroying a $3.2 billion industry. The Supreme Court is currently examining whether the Centre even had constitutional authority to pass PROGA gambling regulation historically sits in the State List. That ruling could reshape everything. Until then, the damage compounds.
Watch The Real Money Gaming Ban/The Displacement Effect Full Video :
Subscribe to The Indian Game Journal for more such content.
